The Sensitivities of Small, Backward Nations: Austria-Hungary, Serbia, and the Regulation of the Danube 1870-71
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the importance of the Danube as a potential conduit for commerce, efforts to render it fully navigable were impeded until the late nineteenth century by the difficulty of securing an international agreement. Based on hitherto unpublished Hungarian and other sources, this article analyzes the failure of the Habsburg Monarchy’s attempt to gain the support of Serbia for Danubian regulation at the Black Sea Conference of 1871. Thanks to the interference of the Hungarian government in the Monarchy’s Serbian policy, Serbian suspicions of Austria-Hungary, and the Serbian government’s sensitivities as to what few rights it had as a vassal principality of the Ottoman Empire, Serbia sided with the opponents of regulation. The mismanagement of the Austro-Serbian relationship serves as an object lesson for powerful states in how not to handle relations with weaker states, as well as an illustration of the complexities of foreign policy in a multinational state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".