MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2633488038 · doi:10.1093/ehjci/eux158.130

P1504Resistance of the medtronic micra leadless pacemaker to 60 hz electrical fields

2017· article· en· W2633488038 on OpenAlexaffabout
M. Audoubert, G. Ostiguy, DH. Nguyen, Mathieu Plante, M. Dubuc, Peter G. Guerra, Paul Khairy, Laurent Macle, Blandine Mondésert, Léna Rivard, Mario Talajic, Bernard Thibault, Denis Roy, Katia Dyrda

Bibliographic record

VenueEP Europace · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis Applications
Canadian institutionsHydro-QuébecMontreal Heart Institute
FundersElectric Power Research Institute
KeywordsMedicineArtificial cardiac pacemakerBiomedical engineeringCardiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Funding Acknowledgements: Fees/Honoraria/Salary; Company/Organization; Hydro-Québec, Electric Power Research Institute Purpose: Pacemaker technology is constantly evolving. Although transvenous pacemakers have long been the standard of care, they have significant drawbacks. Thus, leadless intracardiac transcatheter pacing systems have been designed to avoid the need for pacemaker pockets and transvenous leads, and hence carry the potential to reduce associated complications. However, the risk of electromagnetic interference has not been ascertained for these devices when exposed to high electric fields, nor compared to ICNIRP’s international recommendation for general public exposure (4.2 kV/m). The goal of this study was to expose the Micra leadless pacemaker to electric field levels up to 20kV/m, to determine the electric field threshold for interference. Such high electric field levels can be encountered in industrial settings (power utility substations) and in the right of way of high voltage (735 kV) power lines (theoretically up to about 8,5kV/m at midspan). Methods: The Micra leadless pacemaker, manufactured by Medtronic, was tested in vitro, in a high voltage testing laboratory. The device was mounted in a saline tank at human torso height, and incrementally exposed to electric fields up to 20 kV/m. The device was set up in three different positions : upright, horizontal and 45°. Two devices were tested. Results: When programmed to nominal parameters (2.8mV), and to higher sensitivities (2 mV and 0.45 mV) both Micra leadless pacemakers tested were immune to interference up to a level of 20kV/m, no matter the orientation chosen. Conclusions: These results are reassuring since, in the laboratory, the Micra device is immune to interference up to high electric field exposures, no matter the programmed sensitivity. As with any implantable cardiac device, there remains a need for individualized decision making for the safety of employees with a leadless pacemaker if their work environment exposes them to electric fields. For the general safety of the public, no significant concern should arise in individuals with Micra leadless pacemaker programmed to nominal settings or to higher sensitivity levels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.174
Threshold uncertainty score0.393

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEP EuropaceSame topicMicrofluidic and Capillary Electrophoresis ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207