MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2635648210 · doi:10.4050/f-0072-2016-11406

Bell 525 Airspeed Calibration Prior to First Flight

2016· article· en· W2635648210 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Mitchell, Albert G. Brand, Matthew D. Hill, Nathan Wu

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAerospace and Aviation Technology
Canadian institutionsBell Helicopter Textron (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAirspeedCalibrationComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceAeronauticsAerospace engineeringEngineeringMathematicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Bell Helicopter's 525 Relentless will be the world's first commercially certified fly-by-wire helicopter. As a fully computer controlled aircraft, the design aims at higher safety through reduced pilot workload, increased situational awareness, and improved handling qualities. The flight control system that achieves these results operates with numerous redundant sensors that provide flight data and feedback to the flight control logic. This paper describes the development of the Bell 525's redundant Pitot static airspeed system, showing how computational fluid dynamics (CFD) models were used to perform initial calibration of the triplex system far ahead of first flight. Since air data readings interact with the flight control logic, it was important to have a reasonable airspeed calibration available for first flight. The Bell 525 aerodynamics team developed an analytical approach to model the triplex airspeed system to account for position error across the flight envelope. The analysis developed calibration curves for forward flight, descent, and climbs to meet FAA rules for accuracy. The resulting process has allowed the 525 to conduct its first flight and full envelope expansion with an accurate and reliable production airspeed system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAerospace and Aviation TechnologyFrench-language works237,207