Confining T-joints by adding two outer hollow ring flanges welded to additional hollow circular pipe
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Increasing the capacity of circular hollow section (CHS) T-joints is a challenge for the designers due to its closed nature that makes strengthening difficult as the traditional strengthening techniques focus on adding ring stiffeners inside the chord, these techniques require splitting the chord at each joint location into more than one part and this is not applicable for stiffening prefabricated and erected T-joints. This paper presents a proposed strengthening technique that is based on confining the T-joint by two outer hollow ring flanges welded to additional hollow circular pipe. A parametric study is carried out to investigate the effect of the hollow ring flanges diameter, the added elements thickness, and the spacing between the hollow outer ring flanges on increasing the capacity of T-joints for different values of β (db/d0: brace diameter-to-chord diameter ratio) when the brace is either subjected to tension or compression force. Finally, it is observed that the compressive T-joints gain up to 267% of its original capacity and the tensile T-joints gain up to 65% of its original capacity.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".