MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W263915350

Bold Plans for Toronto

2008· article· en· W263915350 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Douglas John Bowen

Bibliographic record

VenueRailway age · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransit (satellite)Light rail transitTransport engineeringRail transitPlan (archaeology)Light railRapid transitCommissionPublic transportUrban transitTransit systemEngineeringBusinessTelecommunicationsFinanceGeographyArchaeology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article describes Toronto’s aggressive rebuilding and expansion plans for its city and suburban transit system. The leader in rail transit in the 1960s and 1970s, Toronto took a step backwards in the 1990s when it destroyed one of North America’s largest electric trolley systems. Now Toronto Transit Commission officials are forging ahead with a 15-year, C$6 billion development plan. This includes seven new light rail routes as well as new subway cars, Scarborough Rapid Transit cars and buses. The city’s Union Station was awarded a C$280 million contract for signal improvements; those improvements are expected to be completed by 2014. Toronto’s GO Transit expects ridership to double in the next decade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.286
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRailway ageSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207