MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2643555548 · doi:10.1080/08263663.2017.1329063

“It was a farce”: Chilean redemocratization and the late evolution of a politically-conscious diaspora in Vancouver, Canada, 1978–2006

2017· article· en· W2643555548 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Michael Hoopes

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbes · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPolitical and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin America
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersOffice of Research and Creative Activities, Brigham Young UniversityU.S. Department of Homeland Security
KeywordsDiasporaHistoryPolitical scienceEconomic historyGender studiesSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Despite considerable attention given to Chile’s cold war diaspora by social scientists and historians, little attention has been given to the eventual decline of the anti-regime solidarity famously cultivated by Chileans in exile. Changes among Chile’s Leftist political movements during the country’s most recent return to democracy were key to this decline and were deeply felt by a diaspora often intensely supportive of an armed strategy to oust General Augusto Pinochet and hopeful that his replacement would be a government rooted in the socialist ideals they had maintained in exile. For many, exogenous political change was the driving factor behind what scholars have called the “collapse of myths” stage that, beginning in the mid-1980s, produced a departure from the practices and mindsets characteristic of early exile in favor of a more Canada-centric approach to life outside Chile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.086
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0200.009
Scholarly communication0.0070.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.273
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Latin American and Caribbean Studies / Revue canadienne des études latino-américaines et caraïbesSame topicPolitical and Social Dynamics in Chile and Latin AmericaFrench-language works237,207