Copperplate Etching, Traditional and Modern Techniques and Exploring Philosophical Concepts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The main idea that I worked with and that evolved through this process is that death created time, and that our bodies are confining vehicles used to accomplish or do what our mind/ soul needs to express. Although death may not seem like a clear theme in these pieces, the temporal significance of our bodies is something that is attached to death, the ultimate end of our physical self. Our bodies are the physical manifestation of the self, a fleshy concept of who we are or want to be. I focused on the female figure in my prints as a means to understand the importance/unimportance of the human body, but also the sexualization of a woman’s body. I am most interested in body language and the shape of the body itself without it being seen as appealing, alluring, or sexual by any means and what makes such a figure evocative, which I explored through different poses to see what they instilled in the viewer and myself.\nBoth the content and process that I worked in this summer derived from Hegel’s concept of absolute Spirit. Hegel contested that there is a collective consciousness that he called absolute spirit and it is both in itself and for itself and exists in time but not space and is the driving force in the development of human consciousness and culture. That history is a temporal sequence of the arrangement of thought. My work was made in a developmental process where each piece was made consecutively, a meditation on the progression and development of my consciousness expressed in my art. Collectively the prints I made are an expression of the development of an idea, but individually they hold their own significance, and ultimately time was extremely important in my research.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".