MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W264517576

From Chan Philosophy to the Acoustic Beauty in the Enchanting Moonlit Night on Spring River/DE LA PENSÉE DE ZEN À LA BEAUTÉ DE LA MUSIQUE VOCALE FLEURS ET LUNE SUR LA RIVIÈRE PRINTANIÈRE

2008· article· fr· W264517576 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lan Xiao-wei, Qiu Zi-hua

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2008
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Technology in Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBeautyEmptinessArtBuddhismSpring (device)PhilosophyArt historyAestheticsTheologyPhysics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chanzong is a Chinese-characterized Buddhism, absorbing the essence of Confucianism, Daoism and Buddhism. The combination of Chanzong and art brings unique content and philosophies into Chinese art. The article analyzes the esthetic characteristics of a piece of acoustic music The enchanting Moonlit Night on The Spring River from the approach of the Chan philosophy. The esthetic characteristics include the beauty of quietness, of naturalness, of emptiness, and of roundness and harmoniousness.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.012
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicAdvanced Technology in ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207