MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2646014163 · doi:10.1079/9781780647326.0159

Relying on urban gardens for survival within the building of a modern city in Colombia.

2017· book-chapter· en· W2646014163 on OpenAlexaff
Colleen Hammelman

Bibliographic record

VenueCABI eBooks · 2017
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicUrban Agriculture and Sustainability
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman settlementFood insecurityFace (sociological concept)Urban agricultureInformal settlementsPoliticsGeographyAgricultureGovernment (linguistics)Economic growthUrban planningEnvironmental planningPolitical scienceSociologyFood securityEcologyEconomicsSocial scienceBiologyArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter investigates how displaced women in Medellín, Colombia, utilize urban gardens as a survival strategy in the face of food insecurity and tenuous support from local government. The gardens in Medellín are permitted under the guise of supporting displaced families, but also for preserving open space and halting the growth of informal settlements. The chapter contributes to the literature on urban agriculture by providing a clear example of the ways in which urban planning (that is influenced by global political economic systems) impacts on a critical survival strategy: growing food.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score0.374

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCABI eBooksSame topicUrban Agriculture and SustainabilityFrench-language works237,207