Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
México firmó en 1993, con Estados Unidos y Canadá, el Tratado de Libre Comercio (NAFTA) que entró en operación en enero de 1994. En estos años, hubo evaluaciones formales de NAFTA, del lado mexicano. Incluso menos convenciendo por las respuestas que ofrecía para cuentiones básicas en cuanto a por qué los gobiernos de Estados Unidos y México firmaron en aquel tiempo tal acuerdo. En este artículo evaluamos el funcionamiento de la apertura de la economía y el NAFTA, como una estrategia de crecimiento, en tres variables económicas principales: Producto Interior Bruto, Exportaciones y Empleo. También proponemos respuestas para las dos preguntas de economía política mencionadas anteriormente. Con datos duros, demostramos que las reformas neoliberales que comenzaron en 1982, de cual de las cuales el NAFTA es una de importancia política principal, han fallado completamente en la promoción del crecimiento económico y el empleo y que las ventajas de fomentar las exportaciones han beneficiado sobre todo a firmas privadas estadounidensesMexico signed in 1993, with the US and Canada, the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) which entered into operation in January 1994. In all these years, there have been a few formal assessments of NAFTA, from the Mexican side. Even fewer convincing answers for basic questions regarding why the governments of the US and Mexico signed such an agreement at that time. In this paper we evaluate the performance of the opening of the economy and NAFTA, as a growth strategy, in three main economic variables: Gross Domestic Product, Exports and Employment. Also, we propose answers for the two political economy questions mentioned above. Using hard data, we prove that neoliberal reforms that started in 1982, of which NAFTA is one of prime political importance, have failed completely in promoting economic growth and employment and that the benefits of growing exports have accrued mostly to private US firms
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it