MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2646811904 · doi:10.1680/jencm.17.00002

Non-linear analysis of concrete structures: a practical design approach to Eurocode

2017· article· en· W2646811904 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Engineering and Computational Mechanics · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Response to Dynamic Loads
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEurocodeServiceability (structure)Structural engineeringStatically indeterminateLimit state designStiffnessCrackingFinite element methodParametric statisticsComputer scienceEngineeringMathematicsMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reinforced concrete is an inherently non-linear material with non-linear compressive behaviour, concrete cracking and reinforcement yielding altering the stiffness and causing redistribution of forces within statically indeterminate structures. A practical design approach is described that has been developed to ensure robust computation of serviceability limit state and ultimate limit state demand in line with Eurocode BS EN 1992, including explicit modelling of material and geometric non-linearities and construction imperfections. The approach uses the MAT_CONCRETE_EC2 material model within the LS-DYNA finite-element analysis package and has been extensively used during the detailed engineering design of the concrete gravity substructure for the White Rose Extension Project off the coast of Newfoundland, Canada. The material model and validation of its behaviour in accordance with the Eurocode standard are described, along with other typical engineering applications where the approach may be of benefit. Specific benefits and implementation challenges encountered during the design process are also highlighted with a non-linear buckling assessment case study.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.719

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it