Characterization of Triangulation-Based 3D Imaging Systems Using Certified Artifacts
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A set of test procedures and certified artifacts to characterize the capability of short-range triangulation-based threedimensional (3D) imaging systems are presented. The approach consists of scanning metallic and coated glass certified artifacts in which the uncertainties in the associated characteristic reference values are smaller than the measurement uncertainties produced by the system under test (SUT). The artifacts were grouped on the same plate for portability. To define a set of test procedures that is practical, simple to perform and easy to understand, we utilized a terminology that is well-known in the manufacturing field, i.e., geometric dimensioning and tolerancing (GD&T). The National Research Council Portable Characterization Target (NRC-PCT) is specifically designed for the characterization of systems with depths of field from 50 mm to 500 mm. Tests were performed to validate the capability of the NRC-PCT. This paper presents these results, along with some basic information on 3D imaging systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it