MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2650774657 · doi:10.1299/jsmedmc.2011._508-1_

508 Education of system design based on 1D-CAE and practical exercise using MapleSim

2011· article· en· W2650774657 on OpenAlexaff
Yuichi Ikeda, Yuichi CHIDA, Takashi Iwagaya, Katsuya Kato, Akio Fukatsu

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Proceedings of the Dynamics & Design Conference · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicEducational Robotics and Engineering
Canadian institutionsCybernet Systems Corporation (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsField (mathematics)EngineeringComputer scienceControl (management)Engineering managementManufacturing engineeringIndustrial engineeringSystems engineeringArtificial intelligenceMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent years, a system design method based on the idea of 1D-CAE is proposed. 1D-CAE provides the idea to perform the system design in manufacturing effectively and efficiently. These ideas realize the design site of manufacturing in a natural way. However, it is not a situation in which the idea can be educated in the field of education since the idea does not provide as a scholarly framework. Therefore, based on the idea of 1D-CAE, we aim to the development of educational tool that can realize a part of these ideas through an example of control system design. This paper introduces an example of development of educational tool.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0170.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Proceedings of the Dynamics & Design ConferenceSame topicEducational Robotics and EngineeringFrench-language works237,207