MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2651110363 · doi:10.18192/rceh.v41i1.2048

Representación del delito social en La Celestina a través de su iconografía más temprana: 1499 y 1514

2016· article· es· W2651110363 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Canadiense de Estudios Hispánicos · 2016
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEarly Modern Spanish Literature
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabajo analiza la iconografía temprana de La Celestina (Burgos 1499 yValencia 1514) como un modelo de interpretación contemporánea del textode Rojas. Su estudio permite resaltar no sólo el valor artístico de lasimágenes sino su valor crítico-literario. Las imágenes hablan por sí solas ycontribuyen a la resolución de ciertos enigmas del texto o al menos abrenuna nueva línea de estudio. Por ejemplo, en relación a la localización deciertas viviendas de La Celestina e inclusive a si el conjuro mágico deCelestina influye o no en el comportamiento de los personajes. Teniendo encuenta que la temática de La Celestina es muy extensa, este trabajo seconcentra en el estudio del comportamiento delictivo de los personajes. Delas imágenes se analizan detalles concretos y se comparan con el texto yaque el estudio de dicho binomio permite una aproximación más creativa a LaCelestina.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.937
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it