MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2651867895 · doi:10.7202/1038723ar

Les trajectoires des militantes d’Ibadan : le succès d’un apolitisme de façade et l’échec du militantisme politique (1947-1957)1

2017· article· fr· W2651867895 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Sara Panata

Bibliographic record

VenueRecherches féministes · 2017
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAfrican history and culture studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArtPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En examinant le cas de la ville d’Ibadan, au sud-ouest du Nigéria, à l’époque coloniale tardive (1947-1957), l’auteure se concentre sur l’analyse des mobilisations collectives féminines, angle d’attaque privilégié pour saisir la manière dont les femmes s’organisent afin de négocier une autonomie majeure dans le champ à la fois socioéconomique et politique. L’auteure prête attention particulièrement à la complexité de ces négociations quand ces dernières impliquent une remise en cause des assignations de genre propres à cette époque étudiée et, notamment, d’une féminité conçue autour des fonctions sociales de gardiennes du foyer, de mères et d’épouses. Les stratégies d’action et les discours déployés par les femmes sont analysés en montrant les domaines où elles ont réussi à endiguer leurs difficultés et à atteindre la visibilité recherchée, mais aussi ceux où elles ont dû se résoudre à accepter des logiques sociales encore trop enracinées pour être bouleversées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.055
Threshold uncertainty score0.109

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.004
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.115
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRecherches féministesSame topicAfrican history and culture studiesFrench-language works237,207