MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2651877972 · doi:10.1137/17m1135232

Asymptotic and Numerical Analysis of a Porous Medium Model for Transpiration-Driven Sap Flow in Trees

2018· article· en· W2651877972 on OpenAlexafffund
Bebart Maisar Janbek, John M. Stockie

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsDimensionless quantityDiscretizationPorous mediumMathematicsTranspirationNonlinear systemFlow (mathematics)Mathematical analysisAnisotropyMechanicsSaturation (graph theory)Hydraulic conductivityPartial differential equationPorosityGeometryPhysicsGeotechnical engineeringSoil scienceSoil waterGeologyChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We develop a 3D porous medium model for sap flow within a tree stem, which consists of a nonlinear parabolic partial differential equation with a suitable transpiration source term. Using an asymptotic analysis, we derive approximate series solutions for the liquid saturation and sap velocity for a general class of coefficient functions. Several important dimensionless parameters are identified that can be used to characterize various flow regimes. We investigate the relative importance of stem aspect ratio versus anisotropy in the sapwood hydraulic conductivity, and how these two effects impact the radial and vertical components of sap velocity. The analytical results are validated by means of a second-order finite volume discretization of the governing equations, and comparisons are drawn to experimental results on Norway spruce trees.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.421
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2018
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsSame topicPlant Water Relations and Carbon DynamicsFrench-language works237,207