623 Natural Frequency Analysis for Models with Uncertain Parameters using Fuzzy Numbers
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper proposes an efficient procedure for finding the possible ranges of uncertain natural frequencies of a finite element model with uncertain parameters. Uncertain model parameters are described by input fuzzy numbers and then output fuzzy numbers are calculated by fuzzy arithmetic. The fuzzy arithmetic used is based on the α-cut concept and interval analysis. To reduce computation time in the interval analysis, the global optimization technique using response surface models is introduced. Furthermore, we propose an approach for finding the feasible ranges of uncertain model parameters when the ranges of natural frequencies are specified. The examples through a simple frame model show that the membership functions of uncertain natural frequencies are efficiently and accurately estimated by the proposed procedure. In addition, the ranges of uncertain model parameters are properly evaluated by the proposed approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it