A stochastic gamer's model for on-line games
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Online games are interactive competitions by players who challenge in a virtual environment. “Gamers Private Network (GPN®)”, developed by WTFast is a game network that provides client/server solutions to makes online games faster despite wide-area networks. “Response time, low latency and predictability are key features to GPN® success” [1]. To analyze the experiments we use stochastic models to investigate latencies, jittering and other delay behaviours in delivering packets between clients and game servers. Our previous analytical work used simple statistics and some Markov-models of the latency time-series [1]. They gave us black-box indications on the interaction between game parameters and latency in GPN® or non-GPN® setups. In this research paper we describe a more advanced stochastic model to connect internal random effects in the system (client, network, server) to its latency time-series. The mathematical description has previously been applied to bioelectrical signal processing in biological experiments, a happy but also realistic metaphor for game networks where players' reflexes are a key ingredient. This is another small step towards rational, quantified and service-oriented minimization/stabilization of GPN® latency.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".