MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Integrating Moroccan Actors into International Tourism: The Importance of Entry Barriers to Final Markets and Their Consequences for Regional Development

2011· article· en· W2653847586 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ralph Lessmeister

Bibliographic record

VenueArab world geographer · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicEconomic Zones and Regional Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTourismDestinationsGovernment (linguistics)BusinessPhenomenonPerspective (graphical)Regional developmentEconomic geographyEconomyMarketingRegional sciencePolitical scienceEconomicsGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

International tourism in the Moroccan mountains is quite a recent phenomenon, dating to the 1980s, when the Moroccan government launched a development project in the peripheral mountain regions. Since then destinations in Morocco have established themselves on the international market and today form an integral part of many tour operators' offerings. This is an undeniable success for these regions, especially because it has enabled many Moroccans to enter the tourism business. But the regional perspective does not tell the whole story; regional upgrading does not necessarily indicate benefits to and entrepreneurial upgrading of all participating players. This article deals with the supply side of mountain tourism in Morocco, revealing the importance of knowledge about access and barriers to profitable activities, about power in business relations and the way they are organized and governed, and thus offering a deeper understanding of the mechanisms of tourism and of its consequences for regional and entre...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0060.002
Open science0.0000.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArab world geographerSame topicEconomic Zones and Regional DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207