MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2654917760 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946602

An efficient solution to the socialist millionaires' problem

2017· article· en· W2654917760 on OpenAlexaff
Maryam Hezaveh, Carlisle Adams

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Data Security
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCiphertextPlaintextComputer sciencePlaintext-aware encryptionCiphertext indistinguishabilitySemantic securityCryptosystemEncryptionRandom oracleDeterministic encryptionTheoretical computer scienceMalleabilityHomomorphic encryptionHybrid cryptosystemAdversaryComputer securityProtocol (science)Probabilistic encryptionPublic-key cryptographyAttribute-based encryption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a two-round protocol to solve the socialist millionaire problem based on the homomorphic property of the Goldwasser-Micali (GM) cryptosystem. We require the proposed protocol to be secure against active and passive attacks. However, homomorphic encryption schemes are malleable by design [14][1]. To tackle this problem we apply an authenticated encryption scheme, called Encrypt-then-MAC, to our protocol [3]. We analyze the security of the proposed protocol, and we show that an active adversary, who has access to the ciphertext on the communication channel and the decryption oracle, cannot forge another ciphertext which leads him to guess the plaintext (IND-CCA2 security). Moreover, the active adversary cannot modify the ciphertext which leads to a desired modification of the plaintext to affect the outcome of the protocol (NM-CCA2 security). Note that our solution can be applied to other problems which are solvable with an exclusive- or homomorphic property.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryptography and Data SecurityFrench-language works237,207