MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2655347377 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946676

Review and development of MMC employed in VSC-HVDC systems

2017· article· en· W2655347377 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHVDC Systems and Fault Protection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlexibility (engineering)GridTransient (computer programming)Transmission systemElectric power systemPower transmissionComputer sciencePower gridPoint (geometry)Electric power transmissionTransmission (telecommunications)Power (physics)High-voltage direct currentEngineeringElectrical engineeringControl engineeringElectronic engineeringDirect currentVoltagePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The business case for MMC-HVDC is becoming popular in power transmission systems. Despite their superior potential compared to the AC and LLC-HVDC technologies, MMC-MTDC grid is yet to be efficiently realised in practice. Operation, control and modelling in such VSC-based schemes are arguably the most challenging research and development problems that academia and industry are presently engaged in. This paper endeavours to review the VSC technology on HVDC applications. Simulation cases of two-terminal symmetrical monopole point-to-point MMC-HVDC that later upgraded to three-terminal radial-configured MMC-HVDC are developed on PSCAD/EMTDC to argue the review and to show the flexibility of MMC-HVDC schemes upon severe transient conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.670
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations44
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHVDC Systems and Fault ProtectionFrench-language works237,207