Lipoprotein insulin resistance score and risk of incident diabetes during extended follow-up of 20 years: The Women's Health Study
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
•Lipoprotein insulin resistance (LPIR) score captures incipient effects of insulin resistance on lipoprotein metabolism.•LPIR was robustly associated with incident type II diabetes (T2D) along 20 years of follow-up.•The association persisted even in low T2D risk subgroups, as body mass index <25 kg/m2 and HbA1c <5.7%.•In the intermediate risk Framingham T2D score, LPIR improved risk classification in a clinically relevant magnitude.•LPIR may enhance T2D prevention strategies by detecting more accurately at-risk populations, who would otherwise be unaware of their increased risk. BackgroundType II diabetes (T2D) is preceded by prolonged insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency incompletely captured by glucose metabolism parameters, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides.ObjectiveWhether lipoprotein insulin resistance (LPIR) score, a metabolomic marker, is associated with incident diabetes and improves risk reclassification over traditional markers on extended follow-up.MethodsAmong 25,925 nondiabetic women aged 45 years or older, LPIR was measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a weighted score of very low density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL particle sizes, and their subsets concentrations. We run adjusted cox regression models for LPIR with incident T2D (20.4 years median follow-up).ResultsAdjusting for demographics, body mass index, life style factors, blood pressure, and T2D family history, the LPIR hazard ratio for T2D (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) was 1.95 (1.85, 2.06). Further adjusting for HbA1c, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, HDL and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LPIR HR was attenuated to 1.41 (1.31, 1.53) and had the strongest association with T2D after HbA1C in mutually adjusted models. The association persisted even in those with optimal clinical profiles, adjusted HR per standard deviation 1.91 (1.17, 3.13). In participants deemed at intermediate T2D risk by the Framingham Offspring T2D score, LPIR led to a net reclassification of 0.145 (0.117, 0.175).ConclusionIn middle-aged or older healthy women followed prospectively for over 20 years, LPIR was robustly associated with incident T2D, including among those with an optimal clinical metabolic profile. LPIR improved T2D risk classification and may guide early and targeted prevention strategies. Type II diabetes (T2D) is preceded by prolonged insulin resistance and relative insulin deficiency incompletely captured by glucose metabolism parameters, high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol and triglycerides. Whether lipoprotein insulin resistance (LPIR) score, a metabolomic marker, is associated with incident diabetes and improves risk reclassification over traditional markers on extended follow-up. Among 25,925 nondiabetic women aged 45 years or older, LPIR was measured by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy as a weighted score of very low density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and HDL particle sizes, and their subsets concentrations. We run adjusted cox regression models for LPIR with incident T2D (20.4 years median follow-up). Adjusting for demographics, body mass index, life style factors, blood pressure, and T2D family history, the LPIR hazard ratio for T2D (hazard ratio [HR] per standard deviation, 95% confidence interval) was 1.95 (1.85, 2.06). Further adjusting for HbA1c, C-reactive protein, triglycerides, HDL and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, LPIR HR was attenuated to 1.41 (1.31, 1.53) and had the strongest association with T2D after HbA1C in mutually adjusted models. The association persisted even in those with optimal clinical profiles, adjusted HR per standard deviation 1.91 (1.17, 3.13). In participants deemed at intermediate T2D risk by the Framingham Offspring T2D score, LPIR led to a net reclassification of 0.145 (0.117, 0.175). In middle-aged or older healthy women followed prospectively for over 20 years, LPIR was robustly associated with incident T2D, including among those with an optimal clinical metabolic profile. LPIR improved T2D risk classification and may guide early and targeted prevention strategies.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it