MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W265698380 · doi:10.4000/volume.2466

Construction de situations collectives d’invention – homestudio et dispositifs audio en réseau

2002· article· fr· W265698380 on OpenAlexaff
LABO

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume ! · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicInnovative Human-Technology Interaction
Canadian institutionsL'Alliance Boviteq
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkspaceComputer scienceArchitectureHuman–computer interactionMultimediaArtVisual artsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We create experiences and ambiances with audio architecture.We are an anonymous collective of artists and musicians experimenting w/ audio & radio.We reactualize a drifting theory thru post-radio, sound-systems and computers.We explore portable, mobile, temporary & immersive audio spaces.We favour loading forms, immaterial works and time-based objects.We experiment micro-forms & replicas & duplicatas & palimpsests.We develop social tactics & share a creative, experimental, workspace.We open u...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.812
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.281
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume !Same topicInnovative Human-Technology InteractionFrench-language works237,207