Bibliographic record
Abstract
Scotland made a significant contribution to the intellectual and artistic life of Enlightenment Europe despite having a small population. In philosophy, the Scottish Enlightenment can be seen as beginning in 1725 with the publication of a series of treatises by Francis Hutcheson. David Hume published the first volumes of his <italic>Treatise of Human Nature</italic> in 1739, Adam Ferguson's <italic>Essay on the History of Civil Society</italic> appeared in 1769 while Adam Smith's <italic>Theory of Moral Sentiments</italic> and <italic>Inquiry into the Wealth of Nations</italic> in 1759 and 1776, respectively. These extraordinary masterpieces are only the most enduring testaments to the vitality of an intellectual community whose members were deeply engaged with the politics of the time, and the problems of political philosophy were of central concern to them. This article discusses the Scottish Enlightenment, focusing on justice, allegiance, and the moral sentiments; liberty, equality, and forms of government; the development of political economy; skepticism, conservatism, and reform; and philosophical history.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".