alexithymie et Psychopathologie chez des femmes qui consultent pour des problèmes d’alimentation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’alexithymie est associée à des troubles des conduites alimentaires (TCA). L’étude actuelle s’intéresse aux relations entre l’alexithymie, les comportements alimentaires problématiques et la psychopathologie. Cent trente-quatre femmes ont rempli des questionnaires en ligne évaluant l’alexithymie, les attitudes et comportements alimentaires problématiques, l’estime de soi, le perfectionnisme et les symptômes dépressifs. Les résultats montrent que les participantes qui obtiennent un score d’alexithymie élevé présentent une symptomatologie alimentaire et générale significativement plus élevée. Les régressions linéaires effectuées révèlent que les symptômes dépressifs prédisent significativement le degré d’alexithymie et celui-ci prédit la présence de comportements compensatoires. Les résultats de l’étude indiquent la pertinence d’évaluer plus systématiquement le degré d’alexithymie chez les personnes qui consultent pour des difficultés alimentaires et d’agir sur celle-ci.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".