Detection of lumen and media-adventitia borders in IVUS images using sparse auto-encoder neural network
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes an artificial neural network (ANN) method that employs a feature-learning algorithm to detect the lumen and MA borders in intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) images. Three types of imaging features including spatial, neighboring, and gradient features were used as the input features to the neural network, and then the different vascular layers were distinguished using two sparse autoencoders and one softmax classifier. To smooth the lumen and MA borders detected by the ANN method, we used the active contour model. The performance of our approach was compared with the manual drawing method and another existing method on 538 IVUS images from six subjects. Results showed that our approach had a high correlation (r = 0.9284 ~ 0.9875 for all measurements) and good agreement (bias = 0.0148 ~ 0.4209 mm) with the manual drawing method, and small detection error (lumen border: 0.0928±0.0935 mm, MA border: 0.1056±0.1088 mm). The average time to process each image was 14±4.6 seconds. The obtained results indicate that our proposed approach can be used to efficiently and accurately detect the lumen and MA borders in IVUS images.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".