Phylogenetic diversification and developmental implications of poly-(R)-3-hydroxyalkanoate gene cluster assembly in prokaryotes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Many polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHAs) system genes, such as phaC, phaA, phaB, phaR, phaP and phaZ, are often found to be organised in the form of operon-like clusters. In this study, a genome survey was performed to identify such clustered PHA systems among 256 prokaryotic organisms. These data were then used to generate a comprehensive 16S rRNA species tree depicting the phylogenetic distribution of the observed clusters with diverse gene arrangements. In addition, the gene occurrences and physical linkages between PHA system genes were quantitatively estimated. From this, we identified a centrally connected hub gene, i.e. the phaC gene of PHA. Furthermore, a comparative investigation was performed between the clusters of PHA and glycogen, which decoded the role of the hub gene in the cluster organisation of both systems. Together, these findings suggest that the highly connected hub gene might contribute substantively towards the organisation and maintenance of the gene network connectivity in the clusters, particularly in the storage reserve systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".