Le geste technique minier à partir des fonds des Charbonnages de France conservés aux Archives nationales du monde du travail
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le geste technique minier à partir des fonds des Charbonnages de France conservés aux Archives nationales du monde du travail.Les Archives nationales du monde du travail à Roubaix conservent environ 5 kilomètres d’archives minières en provenance des anciennes compagnies des mines et des Charbonnages de France. Ces fonds représentent une source importante sur le geste technique minier, c’est-à-dire l’extraction du charbon au fond par le mineur. Étudier cette question à partir de ces fonds, c’est avant tout poser la question de la formation, de la transmission des savoirs miniers, et notamment du geste technique, mais aussi l’évolution de ce dernier face à la mécanisation, l’électrification et à l’apparition de la nouvelle préoccupation liée au bien-être des travailleurs, à savoir la sécurité et l’ergonomie. Cette contribution met en évidence ces documents relatifs au geste technique minier conservés au sein de ces fonds. Elle aborde la manière dont ce geste était enseigné et comment il était visible et diffusé dans et hors de la mine.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".