MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2660435829 · doi:10.5539/ibr.v10n7p148

Export Effect of China’s Outward FDI: Provincial Panel Data Analysis

2017· article· en· W2660435829 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaohui Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Business Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicGlobal trade and economics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsForeign direct investmentChinaPanel dataInternational economicsForeign capitalInvestment (military)EconomicsInternational tradeBusinessMonetary economicsMacroeconomicsGeographyEconometricsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

China’s direct investment overseas reaches US$170.11 billion and is US$44 billion more than the actual use of foreign investment, which makes China a net capital exporter. Large scale of Outward Foreign Direct Investment also has a great influence on the export. This article made an estimation on the export effect of Outward Foreign Direct Investment through fixed effect model and Generalized Method of Moment based on the provincial panel data from 2004 to 2014. The result shows Outward Foreign Direct Investment has a positive effect on export whether in the whole country or in different districts, every 1% increase of Outward Foreign Direct Investment will lead to about 0.1% rising in export, and moreover positive effect of Outward Foreign Direct Investment in the middle and western districts is stronger than that in the eastern district.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.659
Threshold uncertainty score0.685

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.274
GPT teacher head0.377
Teacher spread0.104 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Business ResearchSame topicGlobal trade and economicsFrench-language works237,207