MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2660475547 · doi:10.1002/ird.2131

Performance Evaluation of Constant Versus Variable Rate Irrigation

2017· article· en· W2660475547 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueIrrigation and Drainage · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicIrrigation Practices and Water Management
Canadian institutionsAlberta Ministry of Agriculture and ForestryAgriculture Food and Rural DevelopmentMcGill University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaAlberta Agriculture and Forestry
KeywordsIrrigationCenter pivot irrigationEnvironmental scienceVariable (mathematics)MathematicsWind speedSoil gradationHydrology (agriculture)Soil scienceMeteorologyGeographyAgronomyEngineeringGeotechnical engineeringBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Variable rate irrigation (VRI) can increase water use efficiency and productivity by applying water based on site‐specific needs. In this study, the performance of a five‐span centre‐pivot irrigation system (CPIS) retrofitted with a commercial variable‐rate irrigation package was evaluated at constant and variable application depths at the Alberta Irrigation Technology Centre (AITC) in southern Alberta, Canada. Two sets of experiments were designed to investigate the uniformity of application of the system during the 2013 and 2014 growing seasons. The first set of catch‐can trials were carried out with three irrigation rates in the direction of pivot travel. Three different wind regimes were observed during the catch‐can trials. Catch‐cans were arranged in grid configurations within the experimental plots located under one irrigation zone in span 4. The Christiansen coefficient of uniformity (CU) ranged from 90.4 to 94.4%. Wind speeds of 3.3 and 6.5 m s ‐1 negatively and significantly impacted the CU values. The second set of catch‐can trials were performed with used and new sprinklers in a transect along the pivot lateral during the 2014 growing season. The Heermann and Hein coefficient of uniformity (CU HH ) ranged from 89.0 to 93.5% and from 81.7 to 94.4% with constant and variable application depths, respectively. The greatest (94.4%) and least (81.7%) CU HH values were observed where water applications were 100 and 40% of the set point, respectively. Overall, the uniformity of application of CPIS retrofitted with the commercial VRI package both along the system's lateral and in the travel direction were above 90% for the majority of the trials under the different wind speeds and water application depths. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.672
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it