MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W266256500

The Factors of Age and Sex on the Perception of Ethics

2002· article· en· W266256500 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Marilyn Butler, Sara A. Hart, William Hadley Leavell, Balasundram Maniam

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory Issues · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicEthics in Business and Education
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPerceptionQuarter (Canadian coin)Public opinionBusiness ethicsPublic relationsApplied ethicsState (computer science)PsychologyPolitical scienceLawGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Ethical are of great interest to the nation's business schools, management professionals, men and women of business on the front lines of decision making, and the general public they serve. Are the nation's business schools adequately preparing students for the challenge of public trust? Two (2) surveys were administered in the spring of 2000 to alumni and faculty of a mid-sized regional state university to evaluate the state of ethics in business and society and the perceived effectiveness of ethics preparation as an aspect of the education. The alumni were surveyed to determine the following: their perception of ethics in society and business, their experience in workplace decision-making, and their opinion regarding business ethics/social responsibility preparation as applied to the workplace. A separate survey was distributed to faculty members. The purpose of the survey was to determine the following: their perception of ethics in society and business, responses regarding the reasons for unethical behaviors in the workplace, and their opinion of the decision-making ability of their students. Both students and faculty believe they are living in a time of general decline. Societal decline is believed to be greater than decline in business. The faculty and alumni responses were cross-referenced demographically. In examining the demographic information, a pattern emerges from the data indicating that perceptions of behavior are influenced by age and sex more than any other factors INTRODUCTION ethics has matured as an academic discipline during the last quarter of the Twentieth Century. Courses are taught in ninety percent (90%) of America's business schools utilizing more than twenty-five (25) textbooks, three (3) academic journals, and sixteen (16) research centers dedicated to business ethics (Stark, 1993). The American Assembly of Collegiate Schools of (AACSB), the highly sought accreditation of business schools in colleges and universities across America, establishes the standards for management education. ethics as an academic field, integrated into the curriculum of the business colleges when the AACSB revised their requirements in the late seventies, includes ethical and global issues as the first listing under Curriculum Content and Evaluation (Horvath, 1995). Yet, contends Horvath, the wording implies a macro orientation to business ethics. A decade following inclusion of ethics in the curriculum, the effects of this approach were measured in a survey of business ethics educators, deans of colleges and universities associated with the AACSB. Evaluating the course curriculum with ethics content, seventy-four percent (74%) taught in the colleges of business, a major issue raised by the respondents was, how to do it, and where to put it according to Schoenfeldt. Ethics in the business curriculum continues to be a concern, especially in light of the recurring breach of personal and societal ethics in every strata of society. By the late eighties, an emphasis on ethics had increased four (4) times in the classrooms of higher learning as evidenced by the submission of professional and academic journal articles (Schoenfeldt, 1991). In 1987, John S.R. Shad, former chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, former vice-chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission, and former vice-chair of E.F. Hutton and Company, contributed $20 million to the Harvard School. The purpose of the gift was to establish a teaching program in ethics for MBA Students, Business Leadership and Ethics, in response to insider trading scandals, which involved Harvard graduates, further highlighting the importance of ethics in the curriculum of business schools (Byrne, 1987). The Harvard School has generated a large volume of research and academic publications on the state of ethics in the academia and corporate America; yet, the state of ethics curriculum in the United States during the 1990's continued to be undernourished, (Weber, 1990). …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.245
GPT teacher head0.426
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Legal Ethical and Regulatory IssuesSame topicEthics in Business and EducationFrench-language works237,207