MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2663191918 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946820

Wireless device identification using oscillator control voltage as RF fingerprint

2017· article· en· W2663191918 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWireless Signal Modulation Classification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransmitterFingerprint (computing)Lock (firearm)WirelessRadio frequencyComputer scienceVoltageElectronic engineeringFingerprint recognitionIdentification (biology)Electrical engineeringEngineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Device identification has been considered as a main trend to maintain security in wireless communications. Specific characteristics of different components of transmitters have been recently exploited as their RF fingerprints. In this paper, a new method is presented to uniquely identify a transmitter using a phase locking mechanism. In the proposed method, a Phase-Locked Loop is used to lock on the transmitter to observe the control voltage of the oscillator. The steady state value of the control voltage is used as fingerprint to identify a transmitter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.816
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWireless Signal Modulation ClassificationFrench-language works237,207