Regards croisés sur la santé, le rétablissement et le bien-être : psychologie positive, psychopathologie clinique et psychologie de la santé
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article vise à donner un aperçu de ce que la psychologie positive peut apporter à la psychopathologie et à la psychologie de la santé, en vue de mettre en lumière quelques-unes de leurs complémentarités. Nous montrerons dans un premier temps comment la psychologie positive a contribué à revisiter les questions de santé et de rétablissement, en soulignant l’importance de promouvoir une santé positive et un rétablissement complet. Nous illustrerons notre propos en relatant quelques résultats d’études portant sur la dépression et la douleur chronique. Puis nous soulignerons les bienfaits de dispositifs cliniques permettant de cultiver des émotions positives et un sentiment de bien-être, en essayant de cerner les processus de changement qu’ils mobilisent.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.021 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.006 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.007 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".