MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2669535263 · doi:10.34060/reesmat.v5i6.56

LEI Nº 12.736, DE 30 DE NOVEMBRO DE 2012: NOVA OPORTUNIDADE PARA A DETRAÇÃO PENAL OU REGRA PARA FIXAÇÃO DO REGIME INICIAL DE CUMPRIMENTO DE PENA?

2016· article· pt· W2669535263 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueREVISTA ESMAT · 2016
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicBrazilian Legal Issues
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Regina
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente artigo tem por fi nalidade discorrer sobre algumas reflexões a respeito da inovação trazida ao art. 387 do CPP pela Lei nº 12.736, de 30 de novembro de 2012. Apesar de recente, a inovação legislativa pouco inovou o ordenamento jurídico, haja vista o teor do Enunciado nº 716 da Súmula do egrégio STF. O referido parágrafo incluído no CPP e a Súmula do egrégio STF, cumulados com os dispositivos da LEP e do CP, impõem ao juiz da fase de conhecimento computar o tempo de prisão provisória, de prisão administrativa ou de internação, no Brasil ou no estrangeiro, para o fi m de determinação do regime prisional.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.516
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0030.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it