MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2669590392 · doi:10.3805/jjes.33.126

Prolonged video-EEG reading: Integration of interictal and ictal findings

2015· article· en· W2669590392 on OpenAlexaff
Hiroshi Otsubo, Koji Iida, Tomoyuki Akiyama, Shiro Baba, Yosuke Sato, Kazuhiro Kato, Ayako Ochi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of the Japan Epilepsy Society · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicEEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIctalAudiologyReading (process)ElectroencephalographyMedicinePsychologyNeuroscienceLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

長時間ビデオ脳波には、頭皮上はもちろんのこと、頭蓋内脳波においてはさらに膨大な情報量が含まれています。この論文では、てんかん外科の対象となる症例の脳波判読に、是非参考にしていただきたいキーポイントを紹介します。発作間欠期における;1)皮質形成異常にみられる心電図のようにリズミックな棘波、2)Generalized paroxysmal fast activity(GPFA)の側方性、3)REM睡眠時の発作間欠期脳波、発作時に関連した;4)側頭葉てんかんの心電図変化は側方性のヒント、5)筋電図も側方性の重要なヒント、6)皮質形成異常の発作直前に起きている頭蓋内脳波変化(棘波内高周波と除波のパワーバランスの崩壊)、の6つです。これらのポイントを抑えることで、てんかん病態の把握、特に外科適応評価がより確実になると考えています。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of the Japan Epilepsy SocietySame topicEEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesFrench-language works237,207