MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2669990934 · doi:10.1299/jsmepes.2014.19.75

C111 Heat Transfer Characteristic of a Plate Type Condenser for Heat Pump Water Heater

2014· article· en· W2669990934 on OpenAlexaff
Hitoshi Asano, Kazuya Honda, Nobuhiro Takeda, Masaki Kondo, K. Nishimura

Bibliographic record

VenueDoryoku, Enerugi Gijutsu Shinpojiumu koen ronbunshu/Doryoku, enerugi gijutsu no saizensen koen ronbunshu · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEnergy and Environmental Systems
Canadian institutionsNortel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRefrigerantCondenser (optics)Heat exchangerMechanicsHeat transferThermodynamicsWater chillerMaterials sciencePlate heat exchangerWater flowOpticsGeotechnical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study deals with heat transfer characteristics in a blazing plate heat exchanger used as a condenser in heat pump hot water heater. In this report, experiments of single channel heat exchanger were carried out by using a pump driven two-phase flow loop. The test section has one path for each fluid, refrigerant and water. The effects of mass flow rate of refrigerant and water, wave height of plate, and setting arrangement, vertical with downward refrigerant flow or horizontal, were examined. HFC134a was used as the refrigerant. Superheated vapor was supplied to the condenser, and heated water. Water was flowing in the counter flow direction. The wall temperature distribution of the refrigerant path was measured by an infrared camera. As a result, it was shown that the lateral temperature distribution for the horizontal arrangement was affected by the wave pattern while that for the vertical arrangement was uniform.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDoryoku, Enerugi Gijutsu Shinpojiumu koen ronbunshu/Doryoku, enerugi gijutsu no saizensen koen ronbunshuSame topicEnergy and Environmental SystemsFrench-language works237,207