MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2670753859 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2017.7946710

Energy efficiency analysis of a C-RAN with distance—Based power control

2017· article· en· W2670753859 on OpenAlexaff
Fatemeh Ghods, Abraham O. Fapojuwo, Fadhel M. Ghannouchi

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPower controlRanC-RANTelecommunications linkPower (physics)Energy consumptionComputer scienceInterference (communication)Efficient energy useRadio access networkCellular networkTransmitter power outputPower consumptionEnergy (signal processing)Control (management)Computer networkTransmitterBase stationElectrical engineeringEngineeringMathematicsArtificial intelligenceStatisticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reducing the global energy consumption is an important goal of fifth generation (5G) networks. The cloud-radio access network (C-RAN) along with power control mechanism can potentially offer the much sought after relief in energy consumption by enabling centralized processing. In this paper, a tunable downlink distance-based power control mechanism is considered and its effects on network-level coverage probability, along with energy efficiency (EE) of C-RAN are studied. Finding from analysis based on stochastic geometry reveals that distance-based power control can provide up to a seven-fold increase in the EE of C-RAN without power control. The significance of this finding lies in showing that by carefully tuning the transmit power, interference reduces and the achievable average rate improves, resulting in increased EE.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.992
Threshold uncertainty score0.277

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.198
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207