MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2670914000 · doi:10.5539/jmbr.v7n1p99

The Effect of Air Pollution on Proline and Protein Content and Activity of Nitrate Reductase Enzyme in Laurus nobilis L. Plants

2017· article· en· W2670914000 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Hamideh Sanaeirad, Ahmad Majd, Hossein Abbaspour, Maryam Peyvandi

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Molecular Biology Research · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLaurus nobilisNitrate reductaseProlineEvergreenEnzyme assayPollutionBiologyEnzymeBotanyChemistryHorticultureBiochemistryAmino acidEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nowadays, along with population growth, industrial development and more use of fossil fuel resources; the damages caused by polluted air are being increased across the world. Because of the important role of plants, especially broadleaf plants, in the adsorption of air pollutants, identification of plants resistant to pollution and resistance mechanisms of these plants are essential. In this study, the effect of air pollution on proline and protein content as two metabolites affecting resistance of plants against stresses and especially air pollution, and the activity of the nitrate reductase enzyme as the primer enzyme of biosynthesis pathways of amino acids and synthesis of proteins are investigated in Laurus nobilis L. Plant. The results showed that air pollution in this plant could lead to significant increase in proline and protein and activity of the nitrate reductase enzyme and the increase was significant at the level of p < 0.01. Therefore, Laurus nobilis L. Plant as a broadleaf and evergreen plant could be a good choice for polluted cities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.334
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Molecular Biology ResearchSame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207