MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2671731334 · doi:10.1002/jcb.25854

Inhibition of Anaphase‐Promoting Complex by Silence APC/C<sup>Cdh1</sup> to Enhance Radiosensitivity of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells

2016· article· en· W2671731334 on OpenAlexaff
Chunmiao Wang, Zhengying Su, Huaxin Hou, Danrong Li, Zhiyu Pan, Wei Tian, Chunyan Mo

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamics
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Cancer Research
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Guangxi ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsRadiosensitivityNasopharyngeal carcinomaCDC20Cell cycleCancer researchCDH1Anaphase-promoting complexApoptosisCell cycle checkpointChemistryBiologyCellMedicineRadiation therapyInternal medicineAnaphaseBiochemistryCadherin

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT The aim of this study was to investigate the possibility of APC/C Cdh1 as a potential therapeutic target in the radiosensitivity of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) cell CNE‐1, and explain the role of APC subunits after silence of Cdh1 combined with radiotherapy. Transfection with Cdh1 shRNA significantly increased the radiosensitivity of CNE‐1 cells and the radiation enhancement ratio (RER) of sh‐Cdh1 cells was 1.76. Knockdown of Cdh1 in CNE‐1 cells increased irradiation induced apoptosis and G2/M phase cell cycle arrest. The levels of CDC20 and CylinB1 increased and the levels of Ku70 and APC3 decreased after irradiation. APC/C Cdh1 is involved in regulation of radiosensitivity in human NPC CNE‐1 cells. Our study may provide a promising therapeutic strategy for NPC by targeting Cdh1. J. Cell. Biochem. 118: 3150–3157, 2017. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.829

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicMicrotubule and mitosis dynamicsFrench-language works237,207