MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W267251455

India's Prospects in Latin America and the Caribbean

2012· article· en· W267251455 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Deepak Bhojwani

Bibliographic record

VenueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNAL · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicIndian Economic and Social Development
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLatin AmericansRegional integrationPoliticsEconomic integrationCaribbean regionDemocracyPolitical scienceProsperityDevelopment economicsSummitCustoms unionEconomic growthEconomyGeographyEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Latin America-Caribbean (LAC) comprises three principal sub-regions: South America; Central or Meso America from Mexico to Panama; and the Caribbean. It enfolds thirty-three disparate countries, from tiny island states to the mighty Brazil. They have racial, ethnic, linguistic, historical, political and economic differences, which have complicated efforts at regional integration.In recent years, however, with the consolidation of democratic structures in almost all of these countries with exceptions such as Cuba, and a desire to advance economic prosperity, leaders and governments have invested strenuous efforts to overcome difficulties and adopt more harmonious and coordinated policies. The more important countries in the region have also realized the need to harmonize their economic policies to take advantage of the economic complementarities in the region and abroad.Early efforts at integration through ALADI (Latin American Integration Association), Andean Community, CARIFTA (Caribbean Free Trade Association) and others had limited success. More recent initiatives, such as MERCOSUR (South American Common Market comprising Brazil, Argentina, Paraguay, Uruguay and Venezuela), UNASUR (Union of South American Nations comprising twelve South American countries), and to some extent, the Caribbean Community (CARICOM, fifteen nations of the Caribbean) have demonstrated the feasibility and the advantages of limited regional integration.Loose regional forums such as the Rio Group and CALC (Latin American and Caribbean Summit mechanism) provided a stage for airing political and economic views by the regional leaders. In recent years, these forums have helped lessen political tensions and promote solutions to regional problems, such as Colombia-Ecuador-Venezuela and Honduras.Conscious of the challenges posed by fundamental policy differences and pan-regional issues, such as narco-traffic, organized crime, etc., Latin American leaders decided in February 2010 in Mexico to form the Community of Latin American and Caribbean States - CELAC. This forum, which held its first summit in Venezuela in December 2011, subsumes the other two pan-regional forums - the Rio Group and the CALC. The next CELAC summit is scheduled to be held in Santiago, Chile, in early 2013. Chile is the current pro-tempore President, and will be succeeded in 2013 by Cuba; Costa Rica takes over in 2014. CELAC excludes the US and Canada; its thirty-three member states include Cuba as a full member. The principal features of the LAC region, measured through CELAC1, are impressive, as delineated below:Historical contacts, including with the Indian diaspora, geographical proximity, and social and economic affinities, facilitated considerable interaction between Indian official and private establishments and the other principal regions of the world. Latin America, however, has been a distant frontier. Plantation labour from India migrated to the Caribbean region in the nineteenth century, mainly to the eastern Caribbean, comprising the British colonies of Trinidad and Tobago and Guyana, and the Dutch colony of Suriname. Subsequently, Indian businessmen and professionals migrated to other countries of the region, but the reaction to this was tepid in mainstream India.Conversely, India has been little known in most of LAC, with its populations tending to regard India as a distant, albeit benign entity, with admirable spiritual and cultural traditions. It is also seen as a bewildering kaleidoscope, throwing up contrasting images of poverty and progress2. Though there were important cultural encounters in the early twentieth century, they did not result in durable and expanded contacts. The history of the social evolution of LAC, contrasted with that of India, is also important in this context.Most of the LAC region, including the Caribbean, was populated by indigenous tribes, some of whom traced back to the pre-Christian era. They were exterminated by the mainly Spanish and Portuguese conquests, and diseases they succumbed to thereafter. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.482
Threshold uncertainty score0.558

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueINDIAN FOREIGN AFFAIRS JOURNALSame topicIndian Economic and Social DevelopmentFrench-language works237,207