MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2673247911 · doi:10.23977/iotea.2016.11003

Study of logistics distribution route based on improved genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization algorithm

2016· article· en· W2673247911 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yue Su, Yi Sun

Bibliographic record

VenueInternet of Things (IoT) and Engineering Applications · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicModeling, Simulation, and Optimization
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersBeijing University of Posts and Telecommunications
KeywordsAnt colony optimization algorithmsVehicle routing problemGenetic algorithmAlgorithmMathematical optimizationMeta-optimizationComputer scienceAnt colonyDistribution (mathematics)MetaheuristicRouting (electronic design automation)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To solve the problem of vehicle routing problem under capacity limitation, this paper puts forward a novel method of logistics distribution route optimization based on genetic algorithm and ant colony optimization algorithm (GA-ACO). On the first stage, improved genetic algorithm with a good global optimization searching ability is used to find the feasible routes quickly. On the second stage, the result of the genetic algorithm is used as the initial solution of the ant colony algorithm to initialize the pheromone. And then improved ant colony optimization algorithm is used to find the optimal solution of logistics distribution route. Experimental results show that the optimal or nearly optimal solutions of the logistic distribution routing can be quickly obtained by this two stages method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternet of Things (IoT) and Engineering ApplicationsSame topicModeling, Simulation, and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207