Reflective Practice in the Secondary School Music Classroom: An Autobiographical Case Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Purpose: Reflective practice is an important characteristic for all professionals, particularly educators (Reiman, 1999; Ghaye & Ghaye, 1998; Loughran, 1996; Schön, 1991). As a steadfast supporter of reflective practice in education, I have faithfully recorded many of my music teaching experiences over 17 years. Realizing that I had an extensive pool of data at my disposal, I started the arduous process of sorting and categorizing these reflections about a year ago. Early into this process, I noticed that the largest number of reflections in both quality and quantity represented my last five years of teaching in a suburban Toronto high school (2004-2008), where I had the responsibility of solely restructuring and resurrecting the music program. These specific reflections are the focus of this paper -- a case study presented through an autobiographical research design rooted in phenomenology. In addition, findings from this study will also shed light on the multitude of hardships faced by all teachers of music, as well as providing effective strategies to reduce stress, avoid failure, and foster success. Theoretical Framework The very nature of autobiographical research is somewhat paradoxical, as the researcher studies his/her own experiences. Upon further examination, however, autobiographical research is sublime (Gusdorf, 1980). From an educational perspective, autobiographical research can “help both teachers and students redefine their educational experiences on their own terms and in their own voices” (Pinar and Pautz, 1998, p. 72). The concept of “own voice” resonated dramatically with me when I revisited my own reflections, as they captured the emotions of particular points in time where I was pushed to the very abyss of music teaching. Experiencing these reflections then and now, was and is, exceedingly therapeutic and cathartic. I was able to hear my own voice in way that I have not heard it before, allowing me to question and probe what I was thinking and why (Denzin, 1989; Grumet, 1980). In addition, autobiographical research also reveals many “patterns in experience” not easily demonstrable in other types of research frameworks (Bullough & Pinnigar, 2001, p. 16). Methods of Inquiry and Data Collection Given the many facets of qualitative research design, it was determined that a phenomenological approach was the best framework for this study (Mishler, 1990). In a nutshell, phenomenology addresses how humans experience the world (Moran, 2000; Sokolowski, 2000; Creswell, 1998; Rossman & Rallis, 1998, Moustakas, 1994; & Patton, 1990). The wide variety of reflections emanating from my last five years of teaching secondary school are representative of how I experienced the world of music teaching and are the primary source of data for this study. Reflections can be classified into three categories. The first category consists of 28 journals while the second is a large melting pot of anecdotal notes captured in various forms, such as my teacher daybook (lesson plans), post-it notes, rehearsal notes, and even restaurant napkins. The third category is electronic in origin, including reflections captured in 32 emails and conversations/comments recorded in video footage. Lagemann and Shulman (1999, p. xvi) have claimed that this type of raw data is now “more and more commonplace.” in autobiographical research. Through common trends and associations, thematic representations were extracted from the data and classified both texturally (what is experienced) and structurally (how it is experienced), ultimately producing noteworthy clusters of meaning (Cresswell, 1998).\nSynopsis of Findings: According to the data, there were three principal themes that manifested themselves, namely; (a) stress and anxiety, (b) fear of failure, and (c) success. In the full paper, I will provide specific examples from the data (journals, anecdotal notes, and electronic reflections) that will animate these themes. \nScholarly Significance/Practical Impact: The process of reflection helped me get through a very difficult five years of music teaching. Learning transpires not from experience, but from thinking about and reflecting on experience (Dewey, 1933). As two years have now passed, there is another level of reflection that is much larger in scope and scale, namely, the process of reflecting on five years worth of music teaching. In sum, re-experiencing my experience. That is, revisiting, rearranging and reorganizing data about past experiences increases one’s knowledge and shed light on one’s views, values, ideologies and representations of the world (Bullough & Pinnegar, 2001). These representations encapsulate the professional practice of teaching high school music, providing insight and transparency into the nature of this demanding role in education. Ultimately, the process of assessing reflections allows experiences to be linked with professional development (Howe et al, 2009).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.021 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.008 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".