1309 Optimization of Press Molding Die by Fluid and Structure Coupled Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To prevent quality loss of processed material due to non-uniform temperature and stress of press molding die, a coupled analysis is executed to minimize the difference between maximum and minimum temperature and maximum stress at pressure surface by changing cooling tube location and diameter. The coupled analysis consists of thermo-fluid analysis, heat transfer analysis, and structural analysis, and the continuous calculation required for optimization of the coupled analysis is automated by optimization software. Heat transfer analysis is conducted using temperature distribution of cooling tube which results from thermo-fluid analysis to calculate temperature difference at pressure surface. Structural analysis is conducted using heat strain caused by temperature distribution of die which results from heat transfer analysis to calculate maximum equivalent stress at pressure surface. As a result of optimization after sensitivity analysis, temperature and stress of molding die improved by 76.4% and 34.8%, respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it