MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2676073225 · doi:10.1177/0022167817716686

Neoliberalism and the Psychology of Time

2017· article· en· W2676073225 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Sugarman, Erin Thrift

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Humanistic Psychology · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersCenters for Disease Control and Prevention
KeywordsNeoliberalism (international relations)RationalityPaceSociologyProfitability indexCompetition (biology)FordismEconomicsNeoclassical economicsPositive economicsSocial scienceEpistemologyMarket economy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An analysis is given of how the contemporary neoliberal order is reshaping the experience and understanding of time, the ways the neoliberal transmutation of time is reorienting and reorganizing individual and collective psychological life, and psychology’s response to the malaise of temporal acceleration. It is argued that the capitalist dynamics of competition and profitability, the collapse of Fordism and rise of neoliberal economics and market rationality, technological innovation, the supplanting of clock time by “network” time, increasing burdens of individual risk and responsibility, the proliferation of choice, and erosion of the distinction between private and public are accelerating the pace of life. The result is a culture of urgency and shift in the understanding of human fulfillment. The proposed psychological solution of time management strategies and its inadequacies also are discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.005
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.379 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations42
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Humanistic PsychologySame topicAcademic and Historical Perspectives in PsychologyFrench-language works237,207