MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2676537278 · doi:10.7202/1040158ar

Fonctionnement réflexif de la mère et attachement de l’enfant : une étude prospective des liens avec la sensibilité et l’orientation mentale maternelle

2016· article· fr· W2676537278 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Éva Bérubé-Beaulieu, Karin Ensink, Lina Normandin

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicAttachment and Relationship Dynamics
Canadian institutionsCentre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-NationaleCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Centre-Sud-de-l'Île-de-MontréalUniversité LavalCentre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux du Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'objectif de l’étude est d’examiner l’association du fonctionnement réflexif (FR) et de l’orientation mentale maternelle (OMM) à l’attachement de l’enfant, par l’entremise de la sensibilité maternelle. Le FR a été évalué grâce à l’entrevue d’attachement chez l’adulte (AAI), alors que l’OMM et la sensibilité l’ont été lors de situations d’interaction. La situation étrangère, effectuée auprès de 88 dyades mère-enfant, a permis de mesurer l’attachement de l’enfant. Les analyses acheminatoires montrent que le lien entre le FR et l’attachement de l’enfant est médié par la sensibilité. La sensibilité médie également la relation entre l’OMM approprié et l’attachement de l’enfant. Les implications quant aux interventions possibles sont discutées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.399 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicAttachment and Relationship DynamicsFrench-language works237,207