MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2676649194 · doi:10.1145/3085585.3088485

CISters and Intersectionality

2017· article· en· W2676649194 on OpenAlexaff
Charles D. Hepler, Caitlin Ryan, Namrata Khemka-Dolan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGender and Technology in Education
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryMount Royal University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersectionalityFace (sociological concept)MountOrder (exchange)Computer scienceMedical educationSociologyGender studiesMedicineBusinessSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The CISters social support group for women in computing at Mount Royal University was founded three years ago with the goal of bringing together female students, faculty, and alumni in order to help the members overcome the unique challenges they face. After nearly three full academic years, the group has encountered difficulties that were not anticipated and will need to be addressed for future success of the group. This reports on the difficulties encountered, successes seen, and future plans for the group.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0210.042
Scholarly communication0.0230.016
Open science0.0020.034
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0480.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.432
Teacher spread0.366 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGender and Technology in EducationFrench-language works237,207