Effect of prepartum energy balance on neutrophil function following pegbovigrastim treatment in periparturient cows
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) increases polymorphonuclear cell (neutrophil) count and enhances neutrophil function in the periparturient cow. Prepartum undernutrition was hypothesized to reduce the effect of a commercially available recombinant bovine G-CSF product (pegbovigrastim) on neutrophil count and function. Hence this study was undertaken to test the effect of undernutrition for approximately 1 mo before calving on the innate immune response to pegbovigrastim. Cows (n = 99) on pasture were blocked by expected calving date and body condition score and randomly assigned in a 2 × 2 factorial design. The first factor was that cows were fed to exceed energy requirements prepartum (full feeding) or restricted to approximately 85% of prepartum energy requirements (restricted feeding). The second factor was that at approximately 7 d before expected calving date, half the cows in each feed group were injected with pegbovigrastim and the remaining half were injected with saline. Treatments were repeated on the day of calving. Blood samples were collected pre- and postcalving for complete blood count, biochemistry, and in vitro assessment of neutrophil function including phagocytosis, myeloperoxidase release, and oxidative burst. Prepartum energy restriction resulted in lower body weight, a higher proportion of cows with elevated concentrations (i.e., >0.4 mmol/L) of fatty acids, and higher average β-hydroxybutyrate concentrations before calving relative to fully fed cows. Treatment with pegbovigrastim increased the total white cell, neutrophil, lymphocyte, and monocyte counts. Pegbovigrastim treatment resulted in increased release of myeloperoxidase by neutrophils. Prepartum feeding group did not have an effect, and no feeding group × treatment interaction was observed for any of the white cell counts or functional tests. We concluded that pegbovigrastim treatment results in significant increases in neutrophil count and enhances neutrophil function as indicated by increased myeloperoxidase release. The response to pegbovigrastim was not affected by restricted prepartum energy intake.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".