MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2679489044 · doi:10.7202/1040162ar

Capacités de mentalisation spécifique au trauma auprès d’adultes ayant subi des agressions sexuelles durant l’enfance

2016· article· fr· W2679489044 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Julie Maheux, Delphine Collin‐Vézina, Heather B. MacIntosh, Nicolas Berthelot, Sébastien Hétu

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue québécoise de psychologie · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicChild Abuse and Trauma
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoison controlHumanitiesPsychologyGynecologyMedicineArtMedical emergency

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les capacités de mentalisation des victimes d’agression sexuelle vécue durant l’enfance (ASE) sont méconnues. L’étude propose de mesurer et décrire les capacités de mentalisation spécifique au trauma chez 30 adultes ayant subi des ASE. Ces capacités sont codifiées à partir d’une entrevue sur les dévoilements de l’ASE. Quarante pourcent des participants présentent des capacités de mentalisation déficitaires, 33 % des capacités de mentalisation rudimentaires et 28 % une mentalisation efficiente. Des exemples de manifestations de mentalisation sont décrits. Ces résultats permettent de mieux comprendre les capacités de mentalisation des victimes à l’égard des expériences traumatiques. Les implications cliniques sont discutées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.077
Threshold uncertainty score0.153

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.067
GPT teacher head0.355
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue québécoise de psychologieSame topicChild Abuse and TraumaFrench-language works237,207