MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W26876607 · doi:10.1113/jp271593

Клинико-эпидемиологические аспекты заболеваний шейки матки, ассоциированных с вирусами папиллом

2005· article· en· W26876607 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Т. Е. Белокриницкая, Ю. Н. Пономарева, Е. Н. Бунина

Bibliographic record

VenueDalʹnevostočnyj medicinskij žurnal · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCervical Cancer and HPV Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCervixMedicineCervical cancerGynecologyEpidemiologyCervical intraepithelial neoplasiaCancerSquamous cell cancerUterine cervixUterusPap testOncologyObstetricsInternal medicineCervical cancer screeningCarcinoma

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The study of clinical and epidemiological aspects of uterus cervix diseases associated with HPV has been performed. Materials and methods: 50 healthy women and 226 patients with uterus cervix diseases were included into prospective investigation. The diagnostics of HPV types was held with PCR test-systems AmplySens-100-R (Moscow). HPV is widely spread. The patients with HPV and CIN were younger than those with tumors. The development of tumors was associated with HPV. 18 th type of HPV was predominant in cervical squamous cell tumors, 16 th HPV type prevailed in CIN III, intraepithelial and micro invasive cancer, 18 th and 33 rd types in cervical invasive carcinomas. Diagnostics of HPV types is necessary for defining group of risk and preventive examination for uterus cervix cancer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.064

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.338 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalʹnevostočnyj medicinskij žurnalSame topicCervical Cancer and HPV ResearchFrench-language works237,207