MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2688354484

우리나라 속도관리전략 개발에 관한 연구

2005· article· ko· W2688354484 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
황상호

Bibliographic record

Venue경찰학연구 · 2005
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, Safety, and Science Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransport engineeringTraffic calmingWork (physics)Traffic speedPlan (archaeology)EnforcementLaw enforcementComputer scienceEngineeringGeography
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Speed management is not necessarily about reducing speed, but to a considerable extent about planning and designing the road layout and the road network in such a way that an appropriate speed is obtained. The main objective of this report was to develop recommendations for speed management strategies in our country. Safety researches related to speed was reviewed on the basis of literature studies. Also, spot speed characteristics by several road type was analyzed and speed management methods in several country are described briefly. Outlines of speed management in our country are on eliminating over speeding drivers, reducing average running speed and standard deviation, and mitigating the stop and go conditions. For this, five main strategies are recommended, that is, speed management plan for road user, consistent speed management by road types, acceptance of various traffic calming techniques, improvement driver’s awareness for speeding, and advancement of enforcement techniques. For more refined strategies, comprehensive road safety research related to speed is to be need, including speed-safety relationships, factors affecting drivers’choice of speed and development of and engineering and enforcement measures to manage speed. And an inter-agency speed management team to work on this safety issue to be review, like USA and Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.542
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.373
Teacher spread0.331 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue경찰학연구Same topicEducation, Safety, and Science StudiesFrench-language works237,207